> > So if my rendering engine offers feature X (e.g. motion blur)
it's OK,
> > while if I use some other tool such as Photoshop or The Gimp
to achieve
> > the same, it's not?
>
> Yep, that's right.  This rule isn't so much as a condemnation
towards the
> aforementioned post processing features as it is an attempt to
eliminate
> someone from creating an image completely without use of a
raytracer or
> similar program.   For example, if you had two entries each
using feature X,
> one done with MP and the other with PS, there is no doubt that
the former
> had to have used a raytracing program whereas the same is not
true for the
> later.
But other way around, what were if you paint a nice Pic' with
maybe PS, take it as a texture for the only Object I have in my
Scene, a box, put my camera into the right angle, tweak the

POV...

I'm sure it would perfectly considered as rule violation ....????


--

 ,',    Jan Walzer      \V/  http://wa.lzer.net     ,',
',','   student of      >|<  mailto:jan### [at] lzernet ',','
  '   ComputerScience   /A\  +49-177-7403863         '

Post a reply to this message